Which Sentence Does Not Have Correct Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement

Unlimited pronouns are everyone, everyone, everyone, someone, someone, no one, and no one are always singular. This is sometimes surprising for writers who feel that everyone is (especially) referring to more than one person. The same goes for both and both, which are always unique, even if they seem to relate to two things. These examples of sentences tell us important things about pronouns: Note: example #1, with the plural pronoun, creates a smoother game as an example #2 that forces the use of the singular „be or“ use. In this sentence, the theme is „everyone,“ a unique pronoun. Therefore, all pronouns that relate to „everyone“ must be singular. In the underlined part of the sentence, „prepare a plan to which they conform,“ „they“ is plural, not singular. Now that we understand the problem, we need to figure out how to solve it. Both names can be replaced by a pronoun. If we replace John (the subject of the sentence) with a pronodem, we choose him, a pronoun of the subject.

Marble can be counted; Therefore, the sentence has a pluralistic reference pronoun. The only answer they contain instead of „he“ is „who makes them disintegrate“ and „makes them disintegrate.“ However, the choice of the answer with the „causes“ uses this singular verb with a plural subject, „materials,“ and is therefore false. The original text „the person who has changed the world the most through his charitable actions or scientific discoveries“ and the choice of the answer „the person who has changed the world the most through his charitable actions or his scientific discoveries“ contain errors of Pronoun`s agreement, because they wrongly use the plural „to him“ to refer to the noun „person“ singular. This is what the mechanics of the sentence look like: here are nine contractual rules. These rules refer to the rules found in the verb-subject agreement. Most books printed before the 19th century, even those that were carefully preserved, contain materials that cause it to disintegrate. 3. However, the following indefinite pronoun precursors may be either singular or plural, depending on how they are used in a sentence.

The original sentence contains an error in noun-pronoun Agreement: the multi-pronoun possessiv „sound“ is used to refer to „the worker,“ a single name. We must use a single possessive proniver to refer to a single nomun, and our decisions in this case are „his,“ „you“ and „his.“ One does not use „being“ to refer to the man, and while „the worker“ is not a sexist noun, we can see that the worker described in the sentence is a man because he used the possessiv pronovitch „being“ in the phrases „his green helmet lost“ and „came home happy“. For the sentence to be correct, we have to replace „her“ with „hers,“ so the correct answer is: „Just as he finished work for the day, the worker found his lost green helmet and came home happy.“ A pronoun may also refer to a previous nomun or pronoun in the sentence.